1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 230 kg more than 1966 Jaguar E-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1966 Jaguar E-Type has manual transmission. 1966 Jaguar E-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Malibu | E-Type |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
