1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 149 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Malibu | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
