1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1996 Honda Integra
To start off, 1996 Honda Integra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 276 kg more than 1996 Honda Integra.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1996 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 1996 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 1996 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Malibu | Integra |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |