1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 267 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | e-Ka |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |