1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 425 kg more than 1978 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Malibu | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3788 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |