1978 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 961 kg more than 1978 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet Malibu | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
| Model | Malibu | Mark LT |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5406 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3520 mm |
