1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Monte Carlo | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3000 mm |