1978 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1978 Chevrolet Nova. (108 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1978 Chevrolet Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 361 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chevrolet Nova (258 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1978 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Nova | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Nova | Tribute |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |