1978 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet Nova (108 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet Nova should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chevrolet Nova (258 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1978 Chevrolet Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Nova | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Nova | Micra |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2449 mm |