1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Maserati |
| Model | 160 | 4CLT |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
