1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1956 Lotus 11
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1956 Lotus 11 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | 160 | 11 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |
