1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 790 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |
