1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 160 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | 160 | Elite |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |
