1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 265. (82 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 265 (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 160 | 265 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |