1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1988 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
