1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1992 Mercury Cougar is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 535 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | 160 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
