1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1997 Honda Integra
To start off, 1997 Honda Integra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda Integra weights approximately 114 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 1997 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 160 | Integra |
Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2620 mm |