1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 1997 Jeep Dakar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Dakar (190 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | 160 | Dakar |
Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |