1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 7,253 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (582 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 493 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 965 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (721 Nm) has 588 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 160 | ML |
Year Released | 1978 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 7253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 582 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 721 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |