1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 835 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 160 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 382 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |