1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | MPV |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |