1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 2007 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 160 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
