1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (339 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2880 mm |