1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Clio weights approximately 545 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | Clio |
Year Released | 1978 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |