1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 2008 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
