1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | 160 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2900 mm |
