1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 180 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |