1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 661 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 617 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Aston Martin |
| Model | 160 | One-77 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 750 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1630 kg |
