1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | 160 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |