1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2010 Fiat Siena is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2010 Fiat Siena.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chrysler 160 (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Siena. (102 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1978 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 160 | Siena |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |