1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 490 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | 160 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2845 mm |