1978 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1180 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 165 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler 160 | 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | Chrysler | SSC |
| Model | 160 | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1090 mm |
