1978 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 1609 | 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1609 | Toronado |
Year Released | 1978 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 6967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3030 mm |