1978 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1978 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1970 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (134 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1970 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 1609 | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1978 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2210 mm |