1978 Chrysler 1609 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 1609. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 1609.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 1609. (133 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler 1609 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 1609 | UTE |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |