1978 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 440 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2350 mm |
