1978 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 34 kg more than 1978 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2911 mm |