1978 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 293 kg more than 1978 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler Le Baron | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | Le Baron | CTS |
Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2880 mm |