1978 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C70 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1978 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1978 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler Le Baron | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Le Baron | C70 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2640 mm |
