1978 Chrysler Newport vs. 2006 Mazda 2

To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Newport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chrysler Newport (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chrysler Newport should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler Newport weights approximately 685 kg more than 2006 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Chrysler Newport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler Newport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chrysler Newport (363 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Chrysler Newport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications: