1978 Chrysler Valiant vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1978 Chrysler Valiant is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 460 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chrysler Valiant (277 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1978 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler Valiant | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Valiant | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2420 mm |
