1978 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. (277 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler Valiant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chrysler Valiant | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Valiant | F-1 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1610 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2710 mm |
