1978 Chrysler Valiant vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler Valiant would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chrysler Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler Valiant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chrysler Valiant weights approximately 126 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1978 Chrysler Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chrysler Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chrysler Valiant (277 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1978 Chrysler Valiant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chrysler Valiant | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Valiant | 6 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 277 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |