1978 Citroen CX vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Citroen CX (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Citroen CX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Citroen CX (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1978 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen CX | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 626 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2620 mm |