1978 Citroen CX vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1978 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen CX | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | CX | Matrix |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |