1978 Citroen LN vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1978 Citroen LN is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (89 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LN. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LN.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Citroen LN, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen LN | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | LN | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 38 L |