1978 Citroen LNA vs. 1964 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1978 Citroen LNA is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Seven is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Seven (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Seven should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LNA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Citroen LNA weights approximately 278 kg more than 1964 Lotus Seven.
Because 1964 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Citroen LNA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Citroen LNA | 1964 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | LNA | Seven |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 652 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 432 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 29 L |
