1978 Citroen LNA vs. 1969 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1978 Citroen LNA is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 987 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Mazda 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda 1000 (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda 1000 should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Because 1969 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Citroen LNA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda 1000 (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen LNA. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen LNA | 1969 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | LNA | 1000 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 49 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |