1978 Citroen LNA vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, both 1978 Citroen LNA and 1978 Volvo 240 were released in the same year (1978). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 240 (104 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Citroen LNA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 240 (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen LNA. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Citroen LNA | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | LNA | 240 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 652 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 49 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2650 mm |
