1978 Citroen LNA vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen LNA would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LNA. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LNA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Midge weights approximately 256 kg more than 1978 Citroen LNA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen LNA. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen LNA | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | LNA | Midge |
Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 49 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |